|
Entity URI |
Relation |
Entity URI |
Mappable |
Mediation Inconsistency |
Mediation Date |
Mediation Method |
Mediation Tool |
Creator |
| 1. |
http://www.loa-cnr.it/ontologies/DOLCE-Lite.owl#particular |
Equivalence |
http://www.onto-med.de/ontologies/gfo.owl#Individual |
Yes |
- |
2012-11-21 |
Manual |
- |
Zubeida Khan: zkhan@csir.co.za |
| 2. |
http://www.loa-cnr.it/ontologies/DOLCE-Lite.owl#endurant |
Equivalence |
http://www.onto-med.de/ontologies/gfo.owl#Presential |
Yes |
- |
2012-11-21 |
Manual |
- |
Zubeida Khan: zkhan@csir.co.za |
| 3. |
http://www.loa-cnr.it/ontologies/DOLCE-Lite.owl#physical-object |
Equivalence |
http://www.onto-med.de/ontologies/gfo.owl#Material_object |
Yes |
- |
2012-11-21 |
Manual |
- |
Zubeida Khan: zkhan@csir.co.za |
| 4. |
http://www.loa-cnr.it/ontologies/DOLCE-Lite.owl#amount-of-matter |
Equivalence |
http://www.onto-med.de/ontologies/gfo.owl#Amount_of_substrate |
Yes |
- |
2012-11-21 |
Manual |
- |
Zubeida Khan: zkhan@csir.co.za |
| 5. |
http://www.loa-cnr.it/ontologies/DOLCE-Lite.owl#perdurant |
Equivalence |
http://www.onto-med.de/ontologies/gfo.owl#Occurrent |
Yes |
- |
2012-11-21 |
Manual |
- |
Zubeida Khan: zkhan@csir.co.za |
| 6. |
http://www.loa-cnr.it/ontologies/DOLCE-Lite.owl#process |
Equivalence |
http://www.onto-med.de/ontologies/gfo.owl#Process |
No |
DOLCE's process is a subclass of its perdurant. GFO's Process is disjoint to its Occurrent. GFO's Occurrent is equivalent to DOLCE's perdurant. This inconsistency is a result of the OWL DisjointClasses class axiom. In this equivalence relation; GFO's Process is disjoint to a superclass of DOLCE's process; hence the two classes cannot be equivalent. |
2012-11-21 |
Manual |
- |
Zubeida Khan: zkhan@csir.co.za |
| 7. |
http://www.loa-cnr.it/ontologies/DOLCE-Lite.owl#state |
Equivalence |
http://www.onto-med.de/ontologies/gfo.owl#State |
No |
DOLCE's state is a subclass of its perdurant. DOLCE's state is equivalent to GFO's State. GFO's State is a subclass of its Process. GFO's Process is disjoint to its Occurrent. GFO's Occurrent is equivalent to DOLCE's perdurant. This inconsistency is a result of the OWL DisjointClasses class axiom. In this equivalence relation; both DOLCE's state and GFO's State are subclasses of two classes that are disjoint; hence the two classes cannot be equivalent. |
2012-11-21 |
Manual |
- |
Zubeida Khan: zkhan@csir.co.za |
| 8. |
http://www.loa-cnr.it/ontologies/DOLCE-Lite.owl#abstract |
Equivalence |
http://www.onto-med.de/ontologies/gfo.owl#Abstract |
Yes |
- |
2012-11-21 |
Manual |
- |
Zubeida Khan: zkhan@csir.co.za |
| 9. |
http://www.loa-cnr.it/ontologies/DOLCE-Lite.owl#quality |
Equivalence |
http://www.onto-med.de/ontologies/gfo.owl#Property |
Yes |
- |
2012-11-21 |
Manual |
- |
Zubeida Khan: zkhan@csir.co.za |
| 10. |
http://www.loa-cnr.it/ontologies/DOLCE-Lite.owl#time-interval |
Equivalence |
http://www.onto-med.de/ontologies/gfo.owl#Chronoid |
No |
DOLCE's time-interval is a subclass of DOLCE's abstract. DOLCE's abstract is equivalent to GFO's Abstract. GFO's Chronoid is a subclass of GFO's Space_Time. GFO's Space_Time is disjoint to GFO's Abstract. This inconsistency is a result of the OWL DisjointClasses class axiom. In this equivalence relation; both DOLCE's time-interval and GFO's Chronoid are subclasses of two classes that are disjoint; hence the two classes cannot be equivalent. |
2012-11-21 |
Manual |
- |
Zubeida Khan: zkhan@csir.co.za |
| 11. |
http://www.loa-cnr.it/ontologies/DOLCE-Lite.owl#space-region |
Equivalence |
http://www.onto-med.de/ontologies/gfo.owl#Spatial_region |
No |
DOLCE's space-region is a subclass of DOLCE's abstract. DOLCE's abstract is equivalent to GFO's Abstract. GFO's Spatial_region is a subclass of GFO's Space_Time. GFO's Space_Time is disjoint to GFO's Abstract. This inconsistency is a result of the OWL DisjointClasses class axiom. In this equivalence relation; both DOLCE's space-region and GFO's Spatial_region are subclasses of two classes that are disjoint; hence the two classes cannot be equivalent. |
2012-11-21 |
Manual |
- |
Zubeida Khan: zkhan@csir.co.za |
| 12. |
http://www.loa-cnr.it/ontologies/DOLCE-Lite.owl#temporal-region |
Equivalence |
http://www.onto-med.de/ontologies/gfo.owl#Temporal_region |
No |
DOLCE's temporal-region is a subclass of DOLCE's abstract. DOLCE's abstract is equivalent to GFO's Abstract. GFO's Temporal_region is a subclass of GFO's Space_Time. GFO's Space_Time is disjoint to GFO's Abstract. This inconsistency is a result of the OWL DisjointClasses class axiom. In this equivalence relation; both DOLCE's temporal-region and GFO's Temporal_region are subclasses of two classes that are disjoint; hence the two classes cannot be equivalent. |
2012-11-21 |
Manual |
- |
Zubeida Khan: zkhan@csir.co.za |
| 13. |
http://www.loa-cnr.it/ontologies/DOLCE-Lite.owl#event |
Equivalence |
http://www.onto-med.de/ontologies/gfo.owl#Event |
Yes |
- |
2012-11-21 |
Manual |
- |
Zubeida Khan: zkhan@csir.co.za |
| 14. |
http://www.loa-cnr.it/ontologies/DOLCE-Lite.owl#generic-dependent |
Equivalence |
http://www.onto-med.de/ontologies/gfo.owl#necessary_for |
Yes |
- |
2012-11-21 |
Manual |
- |
Zubeida Khan: zkhan@csir.co.za |
| 15. |
http://www.loa-cnr.it/ontologies/DOLCE-Lite.owl#generically-dependent-on |
Equivalence |
http://www.onto-med.de/ontologies/gfo.owl#depends_on |
Yes |
- |
2012-11-21 |
Manual |
- |
Zubeida Khan: zkhan@csir.co.za |
| 16. |
http://www.loa-cnr.it/ontologies/DOLCE-Lite.owl#part |
Equivalence |
http://www.onto-med.de/ontologies/gfo.owl#abstract_has_part |
Yes |
- |
2012-11-21 |
Manual |
- |
Zubeida Khan: zkhan@csir.co.za |
| 17. |
http://www.loa-cnr.it/ontologies/DOLCE-Lite.owl#part-of |
Equivalence |
http://www.onto-med.de/ontologies/gfo.owl#abstract_part_of |
Yes |
- |
2012-11-21 |
Manual |
- |
Zubeida Khan: zkhan@csir.co.za |
| 18. |
http://www.loa-cnr.it/ontologies/DOLCE-Lite.owl#proper-part |
Equivalence |
http://www.onto-med.de/ontologies/gfo.owl#has_proper_part |
Yes |
- |
2012-11-21 |
Manual |
- |
Zubeida Khan: zkhan@csir.co.za |
| 19. |
http://www.loa-cnr.it/ontologies/DOLCE-Lite.owl#proper-part-of |
Equivalence |
http://www.onto-med.de/ontologies/gfo.owl#proper_part_of |
Yes |
- |
2012-11-21 |
Manual |
- |
Zubeida Khan: zkhan@csir.co.za |
| 20. |
http://www.loa-cnr.it/ontologies/DOLCE-Lite.owl#participant (subclass) |
Subsumption |
http://www.obofoundry.org/ro/ro.owl#has_participant (superclass) |
Yes |
- |
2012-11-21 |
Manual |
- |
Zubeida Khan: zkhan@csir.co.za |
| 21. |
http://www.loa-cnr.it/ontologies/DOLCE-Lite.owl#participant-in (subclass) |
Subsumption |
http://www.onto-med.de/ontologies/gfo.owl#participates_in (superclass) |
Yes |
- |
2012-11-21 |
Manual |
- |
Zubeida Khan: zkhan@csir.co.za |
| 22. |
http://www.loa-cnr.it/ontologies/DOLCE-Lite.owl#boundary |
Equivalence |
http://www.onto-med.de/ontologies/gfo.owl#has_boundary |
Yes |
- |
2012-11-21 |
Manual |
- |
Zubeida Khan: zkhan@csir.co.za |
| 23. |
http://www.loa-cnr.it/ontologies/DOLCE-Lite.owl#boundary-of |
Equivalence |
http://www.onto-med.de/ontologies/gfo.owl#boundary_of |
Yes |
- |
2012-11-21 |
Manual |
- |
Zubeida Khan: zkhan@csir.co.za |
| 24. |
http://www.loa-cnr.it/ontologies/DOLCE-Lite.owl#q-present-at |
Equivalence |
http://www.onto-med.de/ontologies/gfo.owl#exists_at |
No |
The domain for DOLCE's q-present-at is physical-quality. The domain for GFO's exists_at is Presential. DOLCE's physical-quality is a subclass of DOLCE's quality. DOLCE's quality is disjoint to its endurant. DOLCE's endurant is equivalent to GFO's Presential. This inconsistency is a result of the OWL DisjointClasses class axiom. In this equivalence relation; the superclass of DOLCE's physical-quality is disjoint to GFO's Presential; causing the domain restrictions of DOLCE and GFO to conflict for this relation. |
2012-11-21 |
Manual |
- |
Zubeida Khan: zkhan@csir.co.za |
| 25. |
http://www.loa-cnr.it/ontologies/DOLCE-Lite.owl#generic-location (superclass) |
Subsumption |
http://www.onto-med.de/ontologies/gfo.owl#occupies (subclass) |
Yes |
- |
2012-11-21 |
Manual |
- |
Zubeida Khan: zkhan@csir.co.za |
| 26. |
http://www.loa-cnr.it/ontologies/DOLCE-Lite.owl#generic-location-of (superclass) |
Subsumption |
http://www.onto-med.de/ontologies/gfo.owl#occupied_by (subclass) |
Yes |
- |
2012-11-21 |
Manual |
- |
Zubeida Khan: zkhan@csir.co.za |
| 27. |
http://www.loa-cnr.it/ontologies/DOLCE-Lite.owl#has-quality |
Equivalence |
http://www.onto-med.de/ontologies/gfo.owl#has_property |
No |
The domain for DOLCE's has-quality is particular. The domain for GFO's has_property is Entity. GFO's Entity is a subclass of GFO's Category. GFO's Category is disjoint to GFO's Individual. GFO's Individual is equivalent to DOLCE's particular. This inconsistency is a result of the OWL DisjointClasses class axiom. In this equivalence relation; the superclass of GFO's Entity is disjoint to DOLCE's particular; causing the domain restrictions of DOLCE and GFO to conflict for this relation. |
2012-11-21 |
Manual |
- |
Zubeida Khan: zkhan@csir.co.za |
| 28. |
http://www.loa-cnr.it/ontologies/DOLCE-Lite.owl#inherent-in |
Equivalence |
http://www.onto-med.de/ontologies/gfo.owl#property_of |
No |
The inverse of DOLCE's has-quality is inherent-in. The domain of DOLCE's has-quality is particular. The inverse of GFO's property_of is has_property. The domain for GFO's has_property is Entity. GFO's Entity is a subclass of GFO's Category. GFO's Category is disjoint to GFO's Individual. GFO's Individual is equivalent to DOLCE's particular. This inconsistency is a result of the OWL DisjointClasses class axiom. In this equivalence relation; the superclass of GFO's Entity is disjoint to DOLCE's particular; causing the domain restrictions of DOLCE and GFO to conflict for this relation. |
2012-11-21 |
Manual |
- |
Zubeida Khan: zkhan@csir.co.za |