|
Entity URI |
Relation |
Entity URI |
Mappable |
Mediation Inconsistency |
Mediation Date |
Mediation Method |
Mediation Tool |
Creator |
| 1. |
http://www.loa-cnr.it/ontologies/DOLCE-Lite.owl#particular |
Equivalence |
http://www.onto-med.de/ontologies/gfo.owl#Individual |
Yes |
- |
2012-11-21 |
Manual |
- |
Zubeida Khan: zkhan@csir.co.za |
| 2. |
http://www.loa-cnr.it/ontologies/DOLCE-Lite.owl#endurant |
Equivalence |
http://www.onto-med.de/ontologies/gfo.owl#Presential |
Yes |
- |
2012-11-21 |
Manual |
- |
Zubeida Khan: zkhan@csir.co.za |
| 3. |
http://www.loa-cnr.it/ontologies/DOLCE-Lite.owl#physical-endurant |
Equivalence |
http://www.onto-med.de/ontologies/gfo.owl#Discrete_presential |
Yes |
- |
2012-11-21 |
Manual |
- |
Zubeida Khan: zkhan@csir.co.za |
| 4. |
http://www.loa-cnr.it/ontologies/DOLCE-Lite.owl#physical-object |
Equivalence |
http://www.onto-med.de/ontologies/gfo.owl#Material_object |
Yes |
- |
2012-11-21 |
Manual |
- |
Zubeida Khan: zkhan@csir.co.za |
| 5. |
http://www.loa-cnr.it/ontologies/DOLCE-Lite.owl#amount-of-matter |
Equivalence |
http://www.onto-med.de/ontologies/gfo.owl#Amount_of_substrate |
No |
DOLCE's amount-of-matter is a subclass of DOLCE's physical-endurant. DOLCE's physical-endurant is equivalent to GFO'sDiscrete_presential. GFO's Discrete_presential is disjoint with GFO's Mass_Entity. GFO's Mass_entity is equivalent to GFO's Amount_of_substrate. This inconsistency is a result of the OWL DisjointClasses class axiom. In this equivalence relation; both DOLCE's amount-of-matter and GFO's Amount_of_substrate are disjoint; hence the two classes cannot be equivalent. |
2012-11-21 |
Manual |
- |
Zubeida Khan: zkhan@csir.co.za |
| 6. |
http://www.loa-cnr.it/ontologies/DOLCE-Lite.owl#perdurant |
Equivalence |
http://www.onto-med.de/ontologies/gfo.owl#Occurrent |
Yes |
- |
2012-11-21 |
Manual |
- |
Zubeida Khan: zkhan@csir.co.za |
| 7. |
http://www.loa-cnr.it/ontologies/DOLCE-Lite.owl#process |
Equivalence |
http://www.onto-med.de/ontologies/gfo.owl#Process |
Yes |
- |
2012-11-21 |
Manual |
- |
Zubeida Khan: zkhan@csir.co.za |
| 8. |
http://www.loa-cnr.it/ontologies/DOLCE-Lite.owl#state |
Equivalence |
http://www.onto-med.de/ontologies/gfo.owl#State |
Yes |
- |
2012-11-21 |
Manual |
- |
Zubeida Khan: zkhan@csir.co.za |
| 9. |
http://www.loa-cnr.it/ontologies/DOLCE-Lite.owl#abstract |
Equivalence |
http://www.onto-med.de/ontologies/gfo.owl#Abstract |
Yes |
- |
2012-11-21 |
Manual |
- |
Zubeida Khan: zkhan@csir.co.za |
| 10. |
http://www.loa-cnr.it/ontologies/DOLCE-Lite.owl#set |
Equivalence |
http://www.onto-med.de/ontologies/gfo.owl#Set |
No |
DOLCE's set is a subclass of DOLCE's abstract. DOLCE's abstract is equivalent to GFO's Abstract. GFO's Abstract is a subclass of GFO's Item. GFO's Set is disjoint to GFO's Item. This inconsistency is a result of the OWL DisjointClasses class axiom. In this equivalence relation; GFO's Set is disjoint to a superclass of DOLCE's set; hence the two classes cannot be equivalent. |
2012-11-21 |
Manual |
- |
Zubeida Khan: zkhan@csir.co.za |
| 11. |
http://www.loa-cnr.it/ontologies/DOLCE-Lite.owl#quality |
Equivalence |
http://www.onto-med.de/ontologies/gfo.owl#Property |
Yes |
- |
2012-11-21 |
Manual |
- |
Zubeida Khan: zkhan@csir.co.za |
| 12. |
http://www.loa-cnr.it/ontologies/DOLCE-Lite.owl#quale |
Equivalence |
http://www.onto-med.de/ontologies/gfo.owl#Property_value |
No |
DOLCE's quale is a subclass of DOLCE's abstract. DOLCE's abstract is equivalent to GFO's Abstract. GFO's Property_value is a subclass of GFO's Concrete. GFO's Concrete is disjoint to GFO's Abstract. This inconsistency is a result of the OWL DisjointClasses class axiom. In this equivalence relation; both DOLCE's quale and GFO's Property_value are subclasses of two classes that are disjoint; hence the two classes cannot be equivalent. |
2012-11-21 |
Manual |
- |
Zubeida Khan: zkhan@csir.co.za |
| 13. |
http://www.loa-cnr.it/ontologies/DOLCE-Lite.owl#quality-space |
Equivalence |
http://www.onto-med.de/ontologies/gfo.owl#Value_space |
No |
DOLCE's quality-space is a subclass of DOLCE's particular. DOLCE's particular is equivalent to GFO's Individual. GFO's Value_space is a subclass of GFO's Category. GFO's Category is disjoint to GFO's Individual. This inconsistency is a result of the OWL DisjointClasses class axiom. In this equivalence relation; both DOLCE's quality-space and GFO's Value_space are subclasses of two classes that are disjoint; hence the two classes cannot be equivalent. |
2012-11-21 |
Manual |
- |
Zubeida Khan: zkhan@csir.co.za |
| 14. |
http://www.loa-cnr.it/ontologies/DOLCE-Lite.owl#time-interval |
Equivalence |
http://www.onto-med.de/ontologies/gfo.owl#Chronoid |
No |
DOLCE's time-interval is a subclass of DOLCE's abstract. DOLCE's abstract is equivalent to GFO's Abstract. GFO's Chronoid is a subclass of GFO's Space_Time. GFO's Space_Time is disjoint to GFO's Abstract. This inconsistency is a result of the OWL DisjointClasses class axiom. In this equivalence relation; both DOLCE's time-interval and GFO's Chronoid are subclasses of two classes that are disjoint; hence the two classes cannot be equivalent. |
2012-11-21 |
Manual |
- |
Zubeida Khan: zkhan@csir.co.za |
| 15. |
http://www.loa-cnr.it/ontologies/DOLCE-Lite.owl#space-region |
Equivalence |
http://www.onto-med.de/ontologies/gfo.owl#Spatial_region |
No |
DOLCE's space-region is a subclass of DOLCE's abstract. DOLCE's abstract is equivalent to GFO's Abstract. GFO's Spatial_region is a subclass of GFO's Space_Time. GFO's Space_Time is disjoint to GFO's Abstract. This inconsistency is a result of the OWL DisjointClasses class axiom. In this equivalence relation; both DOLCE's space-region and GFO's Spatial_region are subclasses of two classes that are disjoint; hence the two classes cannot be equivalent. |
2012-11-21 |
Manual |
- |
Zubeida Khan: zkhan@csir.co.za |
| 16. |
http://www.loa-cnr.it/ontologies/DOLCE-Lite.owl#temporal-region |
Equivalence |
http://www.onto-med.de/ontologies/gfo.owl#Temporal_region |
No |
DOLCE's temporal-region is a subclass of DOLCE's abstract. DOLCE's abstract is equivalent to GFO's Abstract. GFO's Temporal_region is a subclass of GFO's Space_Time. GFO's Space_Time is disjoint to GFO's Abstract. This inconsistency is a result of the OWL DisjointClasses class axiom. In this equivalence relation; both DOLCE's temporal-region and GFO's Temporal_region are subclasses of two classes that are disjoint; hence the two classes cannot be equivalent. |
2012-11-21 |
Manual |
- |
Zubeida Khan: zkhan@csir.co.za |
| 17. |
http://www.loa-cnr.it/ontologies/DOLCE-Lite.owl#generic-constituent (superclass) |
Subsumption |
http://www.onto-med.de/ontologies/gfo.owl#has_constituent_part (subclass) |
Yes |
- |
2012-11-21 |
Manual |
- |
Zubeida Khan: zkhan@csir.co.za |
| 18. |
http://www.loa-cnr.it/ontologies/DOLCE-Lite.owl#generic-constituent-of (superclass) |
Subsumption |
http://www.onto-med.de/ontologies/gfo.owl#constituent_part_of (subclass) |
Yes |
- |
2012-11-21 |
Manual |
- |
Zubeida Khan: zkhan@csir.co.za |
| 19. |
http://www.loa-cnr.it/ontologies/DOLCE-Lite.owl#generic-dependent (subclass) |
Subsumption |
http://www.onto-med.de/ontologies/gfo.owl#necessary_for (superclass) |
Yes |
- |
2012-11-21 |
Manual |
- |
Zubeida Khan: zkhan@csir.co.za |
| 20. |
http://www.loa-cnr.it/ontologies/DOLCE-Lite.owl#generically-dependent-on (subclass) |
Subsumption |
http://www.onto-med.de/ontologies/gfo.owl#depends_on (superclass) |
Yes |
- |
2012-11-21 |
Manual |
- |
Zubeida Khan: zkhan@csir.co.za |
| 21. |
http://www.loa-cnr.it/ontologies/DOLCE-Lite.owl#part (subclass) |
Subsumption |
http://www.onto-med.de/ontologies/gfo.owl#abstract_has_part (superclass) |
Yes |
- |
2012-11-21 |
Manual |
- |
Zubeida Khan: zkhan@csir.co.za |
| 22. |
http://www.loa-cnr.it/ontologies/DOLCE-Lite.owl#part-of (subclass) |
Subsumption |
http://www.onto-med.de/ontologies/gfo.owl#abstract_part_of (superclass) |
Yes |
- |
2012-11-21 |
Manual |
- |
Zubeida Khan: zkhan@csir.co.za |
| 23. |
http://www.loa-cnr.it/ontologies/DOLCE-Lite.owl#proper-part (superclass) |
Subsumption |
http://www.onto-med.de/ontologies/gfo.owl#has_proper_part (subclass) |
Yes |
- |
2012-11-21 |
Manual |
- |
Zubeida Khan: zkhan@csir.co.za |
| 24. |
http://www.loa-cnr.it/ontologies/DOLCE-Lite.owl#proper-part-of (superclass) |
Subsumption |
http://www.onto-med.de/ontologies/gfo.owl#proper_part_of (subclass) |
Yes |
- |
2012-11-21 |
Manual |
- |
Zubeida Khan: zkhan@csir.co.za |
| 25. |
http://www.loa-cnr.it/ontologies/DOLCE-Lite.owl#participant |
Equivalence |
http://www.obofoundry.org/ro/ro.owl#has_participant |
Yes |
- |
2012-11-21 |
Manual |
- |
Zubeida Khan: zkhan@csir.co.za |
| 26. |
http://www.loa-cnr.it/ontologies/DOLCE-Lite.owl#participant-in |
Equivalence |
http://www.onto-med.de/ontologies/gfo.owl#participates_in |
Yes |
- |
2012-11-21 |
Manual |
- |
Zubeida Khan: zkhan@csir.co.za |
| 27. |
http://www.loa-cnr.it/ontologies/DOLCE-Lite.owl#has-quale |
Equivalence |
http://www.onto-med.de/ontologies/gfo.owl#has_value |
No |
The range for DOLCE's has-quale is quale. The range for GFO's has_value is property_value. DOLCE's quale is a subclass of DOLCE's abstract. DOLCE's abstract is equivalent to GFO's Abstract. GFO's Property_value is a subclass of GFO's Concrete. GFO's Concrete is disjoint to GFO's Abstract. This inconsistency is a result of the OWL DisjointClasses class axiom. In this equivalence relation; both DOLCE's quale and GFO's Property_value are subclasses of two classes that are disjoint; causing the range restrictions of DOLCE and GFO to conflict for this relation. |
2012-11-21 |
Manual |
- |
Zubeida Khan: zkhan@csir.co.za |
| 28. |
http://www.loa-cnr.it/ontologies/DOLCE-Lite.owl#quale-of |
Equivalence |
http://www.onto-med.de/ontologies/gfo.owl#value_of |
No |
The domain for DOLCE's quale-of is quale. The domain for GFO's value_of is property_value. DOLCE's quale is a subclass of DOLCE's abstract. DOLCE's abstract is equivalent to GFO's Abstract. GFO's Property_value is a subclass of GFO's Concrete. GFO's Concrete is disjoint to GFO's Abstract. This inconsistency is a result of the OWL DisjointClasses class axiom. In this equivalence relation; both DOLCE's quale and GFO's Property_value are subclasses of two classes that are disjoint; causing the domain restrictions of DOLCE and GFO to conflict for this relation. |
2012-11-21 |
Manual |
- |
Zubeida Khan: zkhan@csir.co.za |
| 29. |
http://www.loa-cnr.it/ontologies/DOLCE-Lite.owl#boundary |
Equivalence |
http://www.onto-med.de/ontologies/gfo.owl#has_boundary |
Yes |
- |
2012-11-21 |
Manual |
- |
Zubeida Khan: zkhan@csir.co.za |
| 30. |
http://www.loa-cnr.it/ontologies/DOLCE-Lite.owl#boundary-of |
Equivalence |
http://www.onto-med.de/ontologies/gfo.owl#boundary_of |
Yes |
- |
2012-11-21 |
Manual |
- |
Zubeida Khan: zkhan@csir.co.za |
| 31. |
http://www.loa-cnr.it/ontologies/DOLCE-Lite.owl#q-present-at |
Equivalence |
http://www.onto-med.de/ontologies/gfo.owl#exists_at |
No |
The domain for DOLCE's q-present-at is physical-quality. The domain for GFO's exists_at is Presential. DOLCE's physical-quality is a subclass of DOLCE's quality. DOLCE's quality is disjoint to its endurant. DOLCE's endurant is equivalent to GFO's Presential. This inconsistency is a result of the OWL DisjointClasses class axiom. In this equivalence relation; the superclass of DOLCE's physical-quality is disjoint to GFO's Presential; causing the domain restrictions of DOLCE and GFO to conflict for this relation. |
2012-11-21 |
Manual |
- |
Zubeida Khan: zkhan@csir.co.za |
| 32. |
http://www.loa-cnr.it/ontologies/DOLCE-Lite.owl#temporary-participant |
Equivalence |
http://www.onto-med.de/ontologies/gfo.owl#has_agent |
Yes |
- |
2012-11-21 |
Manual |
- |
Zubeida Khan: zkhan@csir.co.za |
| 33. |
http://www.loa-cnr.it/ontologies/DOLCE-Lite.owl#temporary-participant-in |
Equivalence |
http://www.onto-med.de/ontologies/gfo.owl#agent_in |
Yes |
- |
2012-11-21 |
Manual |
- |
Zubeida Khan: zkhan@csir.co.za |
| 34. |
http://www.loa-cnr.it/ontologies/DOLCE-Lite.owl#generic-location (superclass) |
Subsumption |
http://www.onto-med.de/ontologies/gfo.owl#occupies (subclass) |
Yes |
- |
2012-11-21 |
Manual |
- |
Zubeida Khan: zkhan@csir.co.za |
| 35. |
http://www.loa-cnr.it/ontologies/DOLCE-Lite.owl#generic-location-of (superclass) |
Subsumption |
http://www.onto-med.de/ontologies/gfo.owl#occupied_by (subclass) |
Yes |
- |
2012-11-21 |
Manual |
- |
Zubeida Khan: zkhan@csir.co.za |